In
which we’re conjoined. I’m curious
whether either of us can survive separation.
Allow me, dear reader, if you
will, to indulge in a bit of editorializing before digging into “Dolce”, this
week’s mind-warping episode of Hannibal. Or perhaps the editorializing is part and
parcel of the digging. Lord knows a good
deal of my thoughts have already been beaten into the ground before now,
especially if you’ve been following the epic Hannibal essay project that I began several months ago (and if you
haven’t, get cracking at the beginning.)
But I feel that they bear repeating nonetheless, even in the relatively
limited arena of my readership.
So following the news of Hannibal’s cancellation two weeks ago,
this week brought the news that both Netflix and Amazon have passed on picking
up a prospective fourth season of the show.
Much of their decision seems to be motivated by the unfortunate timing
of the cancellation, as the series’ cast has been released from their contracts
(a common move in a situation like this) and Bryan Fuller has begun work on his
televised adaptation of Neil Gaiman’s American
Gods. Despite the interest of most
of the creative parties to continue the show, the wait for their availability
might stretch into next year, thus delaying more Lecterverse exploits beyond
the time that those streaming services are willing to wait. The fate of the show, then, rests in another
cable outlet, or a lesser web service.
The only way I can respond to
this (especially in the wake of viewing “Dolce”) is to drop my well-mannered
veneer of loquacity and say “Wake up people!
This is a tragedy!” There’s a
whole tree falling in the woods argument to be made about Hannibal’s impact on the popular form, but the fact remains that
what Bryan Fuller, James Hawkinson, Brian Reitzell, Hugh Dancy, Mads Mikkelsen,
and so many others on the creative team have crafted in two and half seasons
has forever expanded and altered what is possible for a televised narrative. As I’ve mentioned before, I hesitate to even
confine Hannibal to the field of
television; it’s as cinematic as anything the medium has witnessed, an unholy
marriage of Lynch and Bunuel. Works of
art like this show what is truly possible on the small screen, and in many ways
they’re much more daring than the majority of major theatrically released
films. If indeed this season is the swan
song for Fuller’s vision of the Lecterverse, then there will come a day in the
near future when the word on Hannibal
finally gets out to the audience that it so stridently demanded: that this was
arguably the most subversive show in the history of television and one of the
most subversive artworks of the modern cinematic medium.
It’s also been a show very much
reflective of our time, sometimes in rather unexpected ways. Witness the two scenes in “Dolce” that encapsulate
the show’s complex explorations of sexuality.
Following Mason’s offer to harvest his sperm for a proper Verger heir,
Margot and Alana engage in a bout of sensual coupling that transcends the
meaning of the term “sex scene.” It’s
intriguing on a purely narrative level, as before now there’s been no hint that
Alana has lesbian tendencies. And Fuller
doesn’t seem like one to indulge in the hoary male cliché of all women being
constantly a half step away from getting it on with any member of the
sisterhood. Alana’s intentions in her
alliance with the Vergers have always been murky, and yet following their tryst
both women are fairly blunt about the desire to deliver both Hannibal and Mason
to the authorities when the time is right.
So what remains is what appears
to be a purely carnal experience for both women, depicted in a kaleidoscopic
montage of intertwined body parts and merging identities. It’s all in keeping with the show’s various
plunges into the fungible, mutable nature of sexuality. In this manner, it also mirrors our modern
society’s ever-evolving definition of what defines one’s sexual identity in all
its permutations. Just as we’ve
gradually moved away from the strict male-female gender dynamic, so too has Hannibal defied much of that tradition
in the way it presents desire and attraction (even as it also conforms enough
to said expectations to provide a gateway into its more subversive
aspects.) It’s very possible that the
Alana-Margot affair involves two women who view sexuality as a nebulous concept
to be indulged, no matter what reproductive organs the partners might
possess. It doesn’t hurt that they’ve
both been the victims of sexual predation by two men who’ve shown no
compunction about using sex as a weapon (Mason’s pedophilia from Thomas Harris’s
book has been downplayed in this version of the story, but his incestual crimes
still leave vivid scars.) Or that they’ve
both entertained dalliances with a man whose increasing obsession with one of
those predators has removed him from their lives.
That man, of course, is one Will
Graham, and it’s his long awaited reunion with Hannibal at the Uffizzi Gallery
that forms the other half of this episode’s dual examination of the ambiguities
of sexuality. At various times, Hugh
Dancy and Mads Mikkelsen have lauded Bryan Fuller for the silences and pauses
he’s allowed them in their conversations/confrontations, and this scene is no
different in that respect, as so much of what each man wants to express is
contained in lingering glances and deep gazes.
But then again, so much of what has come to define the Will/Hannibal
relationship has been borne from this same sense of the sprawling, often indefinable
undertones that lay just beneath the surface of their interactions. The internet meme of the duo as suppressed
gay lovers is amusing, and there’s definitely a spark of homosexual desire that
drives their bond. Credit Fuller, again,
for having the guts to redirect Hannibal Lecter’s previously dandyish but very
heterosexual impulses (his most enduring on-screen relationship so far the
May-September one with Clarice Starling) into coded gay longing. Maybe this is part of the reason why the show
hasn’t reached a broader audiences; the arena of network television still like
its relationships to be resolutely hetero or definably gay in a prancing or
butch manner.
Beyond all of this, though, is
the boldness he displays in forming a male-male coupling that is defined less
by traditional modes of sexuality and more by the logical extension of male
bonding that the culture has reduced to the status of bromance. For here are two men who have found the
ultimate definition of themselves in each other, even as that fulfillment comes
loaded with self-destruction and the possibility of annihilation. Will is able to clearly define the blurring
of their personalities that has taken place, even as he also deals with the retroactive
and future guilt that he now feels for all of Hannibal’s murders. It’s the endgame for Will’s empathic
abilities; he might have feared forever bonding with Garret Jacob Hobbs, but
the connection he’s formed with Hannibal extends to an almost genetic level. Such haziness lends this scene a queasy
feeling, but it also makes it downright touching, a depiction of two people
inextricably headed toward doom, yet also deeply enamored of each other. It also blows away most other televisual and
cinematic representations of the complexities of human relationships in the
depth of maturity to which it strives.
In the realm of complex pairings,
we also have the curious case of Bedelia DuMaurier, who has been posing for so
long as Lydia Fell that she now regularly self-administers a potent mixture of
sedatives to keep her act going when Jack and Will arrive on the scene. Again, in most narratives of this sort,
Bedelia would be the victimized woman or the femme fatale, but Hannibal won’t allow for such easy answers. For the better part of two seasons, she’s
simultaneously expressed a deep attraction and revulsion toward her
patient/lover/captor. But even now,
after so many hints this season of her disgust with Hannibal’s murderous
tendencies, she refuses to participate in simple dialectics when it comes to
her feelings, packing up his bags as she prepares to part from him, telling him
that he won’t be eating her, but still sharing a tender kiss and intimating
that that act of cannibalism might still happen someday. And her staunch defense of him in the face of
multiple interrogations shows the depth her
bond with him, mirroring so much of Will’s situation. On a meta-level, these two relationships
might be read as a metaphor for the plight of intellectuals and artists, who need
their mutual company in a world that is so defined by strict measures of good
taste, success, quality.
To continue the angle of complex
and dysfunctional relationships, there’s Mason Verger’s homicidal revenge
lust. His obsession with eating Hannibal
is a neat bit of poetic justice, but it also seems to hold deeper
implications. Look at the scene in which
he fantasizes about walking up to the table where a fully glazed and prepared
cannibal has been served up, Cordell’s rapturous description of the cooking
process still ringing in his ears. There’s
such peace in Mason’s gait and countenance.
When he awakens to the sound of his phone, the pained, wistful look on
Joe Anderson’s mangled face almost makes you sympathize with this monster of a
man, forever trapped in a physical prison borne from the cost of his own
excessive ways. Mason might be a
horrible person, but he’s as much of a product of his upbringing as any of the
show’s other characters. This single act
of revenge seems to represent, for him, a chance at redemption through
assimilation (or as his newly found Bibilical viewpoint allows him, a “transfiguration.”)
The mechanics of that redemption form
the basis for a scene (and an edit) that is as moving and hallucinatory as
anything the show has produced this season.
Drawn once again back into Hannibal’s lair, Jack is forced to witness
Will (who, earlier in the show, he admitted to possibly wanting to carry out
Hannibal’s killing on his behalf, looping back around once again to his usage
of Will as a pawn from the earlier seasons) serves as the main course of the
recreation of the planned dinner from “Mizumono.” As Hannibal notes “Jack was the first to
suggest getting inside your head. Now we
both have the opportunity to chew quite literally…what we’ve only chewed
figuratively.” As he bores in on Will’s
skull with a saw, seasoned Lecter fans will recognize the encroaching doom as
the same one that FBI sleazebag Paul Krendler suffers at the climax of the
Thomas Harris’s Hannibal. And for a moment, Jack’s ultimate nightmare
seems to be coming true, as blood flies from a drugged Will’s scalp. But that blood slows down into an
impressionistic splatter of crimson rain (an image that has been repeated many
times in the show), climaxing in several splotches suspended against a heavenly
field of clouds (reminiscent of the celestial ending of “Mizumono”) before cutting
to Will and Hannibal hanging upside down alongside other cuts of meat, the
newest arrivals to the Verger estate, Mason there to greet them with
delight. This transition seems to
indicate that the bribed Florence police arrive to the scene before Will’s
brain is served up as the main course, but it also creates enough temporal dissonance
to call into question the nature of the reality of this final scene. But in a season in which the characters have
often moved as the dead navigating their way through the underworld, this
should come as no surprise.