*******************************SPOILERS************************************
Midway upon the journey of his
life, Bruce Wayne finds himself within a forest dark, a liminal state born from
his own tortured psyche, a fantastical future inferno of a broken civilization
teeming with quasi-Fascist guards and swarming with winged mercenaries. And at
the center of it all stands his greatest fear, the Kryptonian god among men
driven mad with his own power, the straightforward path long lost. The matter of how much of this vision exists
as a dream and how much as a prophecy from the future (or a Poe-esque dream
within a dream) remains of some debate. But the scene itself, bracing and bleak,
serves as a microcosm of the film from which it ushers forth. For Batman V. Superman: Dawn of Justice is
no mere fan fic slugfest, but an operatic fever dream. It’s also a fitting expression
of where we stand in this era of peak comic book (or maybe peak superhero would
be more accurate.) And a perfect sequel to a film that doesn’t exist.
I’ve written before in this
electronic hub about the star-crossed career of Zack Snyder. Suffice to say, he
remains a fascinating, frustrating figure in the cinematic world. In the
pantheon of music video directors gone Hollywood, he’s never had the obsessive
focus on detail and procedure that makes David Fincher such a transcendent
talent. Fincher’s films are psychological halls of mirrors hidden inside
alluring puzzle boxes, Hitchcockian exercises in pop art as Trojan Horse.
Snyder’s aspirations have always been more mythological and archetypical, grand
and bombastic, sometimes to a fault. The visually stunning world of 300 is a thing of dark beauty, but what
he does with that world too often never extends beyond abject male
chest-thumping and war porn tendencies. Granted, the same could be said about
Frank Miller’s source material. It all becomes serious to the point of
self-parody; far more enjoyable was the Snyder-produced prequel 300: Rise of an Empire, which coupled
that same visual scheme with a hearty embrace of the pulpy sword and sandal
roots from whence it came, ably abetted by a delirious turn by Eva Green as the
villainess with golden tongue (“You fight much harder than you fuck” she intones
in one memorable scene.) I quite enjoyed his stab at adapting Alan Moore’s Watchmen, even as its stylistic nods to
the book’s musings on the power of nostalgia were sometimes undercut by a
slavish devotion to replicating beats from the source material. And Sucker Punch remains a wildly
misunderstood work, a hallucinatory, pointed critique of the male gaze under
the guise of the thrillers that so perpetuate that gaze.
Snyder’s folly in crafting Man of Steel was in confusing the very
nature of Superman with his successors in the four-color domain. There’s too
much of Spider-Man’s “With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility” injected
into the story; that tack resonated so deeply with Peter Parker because he was
an ordinary, maladjusted human being endowed with extraordinary abilities (the
Marvel template in a nutshell.) Superman’s dilemma has always been more “Heavy
is the Head that Wears the Crown,” the crisis of a god descended to Earth to
live among us. Even in his more light-hearted, Technicolor adventures, he’s
been forced to balance his near-omnipotent nature with his deep connection to
we flawed mortals. And where Spider-Man’s public reputation has fluctuated
throughout the years, the Big Blue Boy Scout has been the guiding beacon of
light for a troubled world. Foregrounding his existential crisis turned Man of Steel into a slog, the sense of
wonder so inherent to any portrayal of the character submerged beneath a
darkness that was tonally all wrong. The emotionally shattering climax of
Richard Donner’s 1978 Superman (in
which the only person Superman can’t save from Lex Luthor’s plot is Lois Lane)
holds such power only because it’s been preceded by two hours of Clark Kent and
his flip side striving to be the unironic voice of hope in an increasingly
cynical world. Man of Steel goes all
brooding Kal-El from the start, which constantly dampens the aspirational
mythology at the heart of the character.
Which is what makes Batman V. Superman the perfect sequel to
the mythical Man of Steel that could
have been. In an increasingly corporatized filmmaking environment, Snyder is
one of the dwindling few directors who has been able to inject some sense of
personal vision into the now de rigeur world-building imperative that threatens
to drown the pure enjoyment of any individual comic book film (and sometimes
any tentpole feature, period.) Juggling the dictates of shepherding a $250
million picture for immediate success, while laying the groundwork for multiple
spinoffs and a larger team-up project can be daunting for even the most seasoned
professional (see Joss Whedon post-Age of
Ultron meat grinder.) Post-Avengers,
it became readily apparent that Warner Brothers’ Superman reboot displayed
their intentions of kicking off a multi-tiered DC heroes initiative, one which
would carry a darker, more world-weary tone than the brighter, snappier Marvel
Cinematic Universe. So as a stand-alone film, Batman V. Superman works marvelously as the purest expression of
that alternative reality, a rejoinder to the lightness that its predecessor
should have possessed. It’s an effect that can be disorienting at times, but it
also shouldn’t discount the power of this chapter of the story on its own
terms.
As has been noted by other
critics, it’s no coincidence that the rise of the superhero film has occurred in
the wake of 9/11, deep in an age in which an act of mass trauma has seemingly
evoked a grand desire for Manichean morality plays writ large on the cultural
canvas. Those who read this sustained resurgence of super-powered cinema as an
inherently infantile turn ignore some of the thornier aspects which have slowly
emerged in the genre (Captain America:
The Winter Soldier’s rebuke of
Big Data and government surveillance, the way in which Christopher Nolan’s
Batman universe addresses civil liberties and the anger of the 99%, etc.) And
yet, the manner in which the superhero tale has saturated our collective consciousness
can’t be discounted. Decades of that influence through the less reputable realm
of the comic book (and the occasional successful film adaptation, usually
followed by rapidly diminishing returns) now being legitimized as the mass mythology of our times creates
a baseline in the psychosphere with often profound implications. As Michael Chabon
notes in the A+E documentary Comic Book
Superheroes Unmasked, the rich irony of golden age heroes fighting the Axis
laid in the inherently Fascist nature of the four-color ubermench: might makes
right. It’s easy to sneer at the legacy of the Reagan-era empty action
blockbusters, but the modern superhero film isn’t that far away from that genre (which itself was a response to the
national trauma of the Vietnam fiasco.)
Frank Miller’s The Dark Knight Returns plunged headlong
into those Fascist implications when it bowed in 1986, and even though it’s
been a heavy influence on the Batman films ever since, this is the fullest
realization of the moral and ethical ambiguity of the character that he
explored. When you think about it, the casting of Ben Affleck as the Bat is
quite the ballsy move. Amidst Hollywood’s obsession with youth, pursuing a
middle-aged, broken Dark Knight is far from the easiest sell. Sure, Tony Stark
might be a similar middle-aged playboy with a bum ticker, but Robert Downey’s
youthful mien obscures the wear and tear on the character. Affleck’s Bruce
Wayne is allowed to be physically and psychologically beaten down by decades of
this Sisyphean struggle, a borderline alcoholic obsessed with constant
escalation of his war against the darkness that plagues his city (ably abetted
by a terrific, wry Jeremy Irons as Alfred). It’s here, again, that BVS serves as fascinating sequel to the
non-existent Man of Steel, as Snyder
and company place Metropolis directly across the bay from Gotham City, the
shining modern spin on New York just a hop, skip, and a jump away from the old
New York, the noir New York. Superman wants to believe that he can serve as
ultimate protector against villainy of all stripes, but Batman always advocates
that mankind’s worst instincts will continue to metastasize forever, a belief
strengthened by the darkness with which Gotham seemingly infects Metropolis in
this story. And if the evil of man won’t quit, then what to say of the evil of
what lies beyond man, what might descend from the outer reaches of the heavens
(as Lex Luthor theorizes in connection with the Paradise Lost-inspired painting that hangs in his mansion.)
Ah yes...the young Mr. Luthor, a
brilliant revisionist turn by Jesse Eisenberg. For decades now, the DC Universe
Luthor has been the most threatening figure imaginable: an often reputable
businessman and politician. Transplanting that concept to 2016, what better
interpretation is there than the boy genius tech billionaires that drive so much
of the economy and zeitgeist (and the actor who famously portrayed one of
them.) That messianic, technovangelist drive which powers the Schmidts and
Brins and Zuckerbergs of the world is super-charged here in a Luthor set on
channeling some greater understanding of what lies beyond, an imperative that
eventually transforms him into a mad prophet of impending galactic doom, the
man who has seen the face of God in his exploration of General Zod’s Kryptonian
ship. His creation of Doomsday from the dead husk of Zod veers him into the
realm of Dr. Frankenstein, and there’s more than a bit of Colin Clive’s mania
at knowing what it’s like to be God in Luthor’s psychotic passion. Eisenberg is
often criticized for playing variations on the same near-autistic character,
but he’s easily the standout performance in this epic film, the crazed genius
counterpart to Batman’s hyper-clinical obsession and Superman’s idealism. He
also commits the timeless, primal sin which bedeviled Frankenstein and so many
other characters of myth: he pisses off the gods. Heroes like Batman might hold
the upper hand against humanity, but the likes of Superman and Wonder Woman
will always have their ability to guard that thin veil between earthly
malfeasance and the ill will of that which is greater than mere mortals. Luthor’s
transgression of that veil sets in motion an intergalactic power that threatens
to rain down from afar. Apocalypse now is his credo. Some have questioned
Luthor’s motivation in all this, but in the genre’s pure metaphorical state he
allows us a glimpse back at our own tech and business titans, driven on by the
fervent belief that greater knowledge and technological progress will always benefit
mankind. Until it doesn’t.
So much of all this discussion
plays out as a series of archetypical impressions…which is fitting for a film
that does the same in its fevered dream logic. The reality of corporate
dictates overstuffs BVS with a few plot
beats too many, and oftentimes the action seems to be moving at such a
breakneck speed that the audience doesn’t get the chance to pause and
contemplate what has just happened. But in the grand scheme of yet another
version of these characters (okay, maybe not as much with the historically
underserved Wonder Woman….but still), it’s all very much in keeping with our
collective consciousness. This film plays as the product of that superhero-saturated
culture, one in which we know these figures so well that they become subliminal
flashes against our mental landscape, in which we need little further
introduction to their origins but can dive deep into another version of their existence.
If cinema is indeed a collective dream in which we participate, then Batman V. Superman nakedly acknowledges
that status. Call it disjointed spectacle if you will, but there’s more going
on here than a fractured series of scenes. In the end, we’re all Batman, caught
up in that hyper-real vision of what could be, beguiled by the possibilities of
everything that we know so well flipped on its head, bewildered by what might
come forth from Heaven and Hell (and from which direction) now that gods have
visited our world.
1 comment:
As stated by Stanford Medical, It's in fact the SINGLE reason this country's women get to live 10 years more and weigh on average 42 lbs lighter than us.
(And realistically, it really has NOTHING to do with genetics or some secret-exercise and really, EVERYTHING about "HOW" they eat.)
BTW, I said "HOW", and not "what"...
Click on this link to discover if this quick test can help you decipher your real weight loss potential
Post a Comment